۱۷
تیر

S. 14A : Disallowance away from costs – Excused earnings – Zero excused income received – Supply isn’t relevant [Roentgen

S. 14A : Disallowance away from costs – Excused earnings – Zero excused income received – Supply isn’t relevant [Roentgen

S. 14A: Disallowance out of expenses – Excused earnings – Onus on funds to show one disallowance was incorrect – Instead exploring the profile disallowance isn’t warranted [R.8D]

Legal stored the onus to your money to prove you to disallowance was incorrect and you will without examining the profile disallowance is not warranted (AY.2007-08, 2008-09)

S. 14A : Disallowance regarding expenditure – Excused money – Enhancement regarding disallowance is held become not valid [Roentgen.8D]

Dismissing the fresh beauty of the latest money the fresh Courtroom kept your Assessing Administrator had acknowledged your assessee had not borrowed funds. The fresh new assessee got subtracted specific proportionate expense, that your Examining Manager had not disbelieved or debated. Volume of financial support, the assessee was said to have obtained costs-100 % free attributes out of banking institutions or any other financial institutions with exactly who it got spent. This new Tribunal had truthfully removed the fresh disallowance from Rs. crores below section 14A of Operate in line with rule 8D of your Income-tax Rules.

Dismissing new beauty of the fresh cash the new Legal stored you to one to as no excused earnings got accrued to your assessee brand new provisions away from section 14A failed to pertain

Allowing this new desire the new Court stored whenever there’s absolutely no bonus income gained, disallowance cannot be generated. (AY. 2014-15)

S. 28(iv) : Providers money – Worth of any better otherwise perquisites – Converted directly into currency or otherwise not – Amalgamation –Excess of websites planning over value of organizations bought out – Maybe not assessable given that money. [S. 4]

Dismissing the beauty of the fresh new revenue the new Court held your provisions of part twenty-eight(iv) of one’s Operate inform you the matter shown from inside the the balance piece of assessee under the direct supplies and you will extra cannot be treated since a benefit or perquisite as a result of organization otherwise take action of profession. The difference inside matter blog post amalgamation are brand new amalgamation set-aside and you can it can’t feel asserted that it had been out-of normal transaction of your organization being financing in the wild, which emerged because of amalgamation from four enterprises, it cannot getting handled given that shedding lower than point 28(iv). Adopted CIT v. Stads Ltd. (2015) 373 ITR 313 (Mad) (HC).(AY.2006-07)

S. 32: Depreciation – Possessions gotten in return out of extinguishment out-of tenancy legal rights – Decline deductible – Non – Participate percentage – Depreciation allowable to your idea out-of consistency.

The condition must be readjudicated by Examining Manager, where mission, new Assessing Officer must analyse the fresh new arrangement dated registered into between the assessee and the SIPCOT rather than wade simply of the the new nomenclature

Dismissing the newest beauty of brand new money the brand new Legal kept that decline was deductible according of possessions acquired in return out of relinquishment away from tenancy liberties an additional possessions. Court plus stored you to depreciation on the non-participate charge is kept to-be allowable. Implemented CIT v. Areva T & D India Ltd. (2012) twenty six taxmann 266 (Mad) (HC). (AY.2006-07)

S. thirty two : Decline – Carry forward and place out of – Unabsorbed depreciation towards step one-4-2002 are sent pass and place regarding in the place of taking to the membership very long time of such carry-forward. [S.32 (2)]

Dismissing the beauty of this new money brand new Legal held that unabsorbed decline regarding the assessment 12 months 1997-98 so you’re able to 2000-01 was qualified to receive stop up against earnings towards the analysis year 2005-06. Circular Zero. 14 off 2001 dated -08)

S. 32: Depreciation – Building – Road – Entitle in order to depreciation from the 10% – Decline on the property held towards rent – Depends on regards to lease – Amount remanded. [S. 32 (1)(ii)]

Tribunal is actually justified from inside the making it possible for brand new decline on 10% in the ways. Courtroom in addition to stored the house about what the business got come developed by the brand new assessee, was belonging to this new SIPCOT as well as the development contained delivering ways inside the They Playground, establishment out of a multi-peak car park, etc. Beneath the contract, this new assessee had to write these facilities and keep her or him and you can that point try said are 99 age, that’s almost perpetual. Ergo, a deeper study of the brand new factual topic try warranted. (AY. 2007-08 so you’re able to 2010-11, 2012-13 and you can 2013-14)